Excerpt:
|
---|
|
---|
Wednesday, February 8, 2012
UC Tuition: His Way or the Conway?
Excerpt:
Tuesday, February 7, 2012
The 2009 "Toolbox" Report and the Japanese Garden (& Other Issues)
The report explores other areas such as faculty pay, fund raising, "branding," and tuition. You can read the full report at the link below (scroll towards the bottom of this post.
Below is the Table of Contents. Below that is the section on the Japanese Garden:
- Kathryn Atchison, Vice Provost for Intellectual Property and Industry Relations
- Hilu Bloch, Associate Dean & CAO, Anderson Graduate School of Management
- Robin Garrell, Professor and Vice Chair, Academic Senate
- Janina Montero, Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs
- Sam Morabito, Administrative Vice Chancellor
- Steven A. Olsen, Vice Chancellor, Finance, Budget & Capital Programs (chair)
- No-Hee Park, Dean, School of Dentistry
- Cathy Sandeen, Dean, University Extension
- Michael Schill, Dean, School of Law
- Rhea Turteltaub, Vice Chancellor, External Affairs
- David Unruh, Assistant Provost, Academic Program Development
- Kang Wang, Professor, School of Engineering and Applied Science
It is not known how much time was spent by the Task Force specifically on the Japanese Garden issue. During the period in which the task force operated, UCLA had a website for the garden which has since been taken down. However, you can see the website as it was - and as it was available to the task force at:
http://web.archive.org/web/20100815093728/http://www.japanesegarden.ucla.edu/
Friday, February 3, 2012
"That Which Cannot Go on Forever Must Come to an End"
Inside Higher Ed today has a long piece on responses in the U.S. Senate. The article concludes with: Perhaps sensing a popular cause to champion with an election looming, senators in both parties seemed eager to continue discussions on how to hold down college prices. Committee Chairman Tom Harkin, Democrat of Iowa, promised more discussion on the subject. “This," he said, " is the first of many hearings."
Full article at: http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/02/03/senate-help-committee-hears-college-affordability-testimony
Thursday, February 2, 2012
Regents Will Consider UC-Riverside Student Plan for Alternative to Tuition in March
Essentially, the students' plan would involve payment after graduation as a share of income rather than the current system of upfront payment, either in cash or through a loan. The proposal is not a new idea. And it raises issues of logistics, i.e., how actually to collect those payments.
There are also cash flow issues. What would finance university operations during the period before the payments first began to arrive? Could the university borrow against an uncertain flow of future payments? Note that some of those operations involve recycling of tuition receipts to low-income students.
The article is at http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/02/02/uc-system-weighs-shift-tuition-payments-after-graduation
Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Worries About the Obama Tuition Plan Seem Confined to Private Universities
A short piece today in Inside Higher Ed seems to reinforce that view. It seems that it is presidents of private universities that are upset.
See http://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2012/02/01/white-house-adviser-takes-questions-obamas-plan
In short, it's one less thing to worry about. So be happy:
PS: An earlier blog post also gave you some assurance about the kind of headlines depicted below:
Friday, January 27, 2012
More on the Obama/Tuition Issue
Insider Higher Ed has a brief story - with a link to a NY Times iece and a link to a White House fact sheet about the proposal. In fact, to the extent that the proposal is implemented - always a question given Congressional gridlock - UC and UCLA are likely to benefit. Our tuition is rising but it is still low compared to the privates and many publics. And we have a good record at this campus with low income student enrollment and support. The issue is whether UC would be rewarded for relatively low tuition or penalized for percentage increases in tuition starting from a low base. The tuition under consideration is not the sticker price - which is what gets aired at Regents meetings - but the net price after student aid from the university.
The Insider Higher Ed story is at http://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2012/01/27/full-details-obamas-college-affordability-proposals-updated
Below is (most of) the fact sheet:
For ImmediateRelease
January 27, 2012
EmpoweringFamilies and Students to be Informed Consumers
RedoublingFederal Support to Tackle College Costs
UPDATE: NPR has a report at
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2012/01/27/145985134/college-presidents-have-problems-with-obamas-message-on-tuition
UPDATE: President Yudof's response:
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Obama on Higher Ed Tuition and State Support
Video clip below.
"When kids do graduate, the most daunting challenge can be the cost of college. At a time when Americans owe more in tuition debt than credit card debt, this Congress needs to stop the interest rates on student loans from doubling in July. Extend the tuition tax credit we started that saves middle-class families thousands of dollars. And give more young people the chance to earn their way through college by doubling the number of work-study jobs in the next five years.
Of course, it’s not enough for us to increase student aid. We can’t just keep subsidizing skyrocketing tuition; we’ll run out of money. States also need to do their part, by making higher education a higher priority in their budgets. And colleges and universities have to do their part by working to keep costs down. Recently, I spoke with a group of college presidents who’ve done just that. Some schools re-design courses to help students finish more quickly. Some use better technology. The point is, it’s possible. So let me put colleges and universities on notice: If you can’t stop tuition from going up, the funding you get from taxpayers will go down. Higher education can’t be a luxury – it’s an economic imperative that every family in America should be able to afford."
UPDATE: Inside Higher Ed has a report on reactions to the statement at:
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/01/26/obama-plan-tie-tuition-prices-aid-eligibility-draws-criticism
Saturday, January 21, 2012
Plenty of Nothing
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
UC-Riverside Students Propose Tuition Alternative Based on Future Pay
UPDATE: The story of the plan was picked up by the San Francisco Chronicle at http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/01/18/BAF11MR30P.DTL
and by the LA Times http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-uc-regents-20120119,0,7115732.story
Wednesday, January 4, 2012
Tuition Bargain at UCLA
Tuesday, December 27, 2011
Don't Look for Holiday Cheer from the Washington Post
Across the nation, ahistoric collapse in state funding for higher education threatens to diminishthe stature of premier public universities and erode their mission as enginesof upward social mobility. At theUniversity of Virginia, state support has dwindled in two decades from 26percent of the operating budget to 7 percent. At the University of Michigan, ithas declined from 48 percent to 17 percent. Not even the nation’s finest public university is immune. The Universityof California at Berkeley — birthplace of the free-speech movement, home to nineliving Nobel laureates — subsists now in perpetual austerity. Star faculty takemandatory furloughs. Classes grow perceptibly larger each year. Roofs leak;e-mail crashes. One employee mows the entire campus. Wastebaskets are emptiedonce a week. Some professors lack telephones…
Thursday, December 15, 2011
Another Hint of Discussions with the State Behind Closed Doors on Multiyear Tuition Increase Deal
The text below in italics is from UC President Yudof’s Facebook page. As noted in a prior post on this blog, there are hints of a multiyear-tuition-increase/steady-budget-support-from-the-state being discussed behind closed doors with Brown administration officials. See the bold print below.
We are extremely disappointed that UC is faced with yet another significant State budget reduction: the $100 million “trigger cut” just announced. This additional cut will exacerbate the fiscal challenges the University faces in the current year and place additional stress on the quality of education provided to UC students. While the $650 million cut to UC enacted by the State last June resulted in additional tuition hikes for our students, let me assure you there are no 2011-12 mid-year tuition increases planned.
Over the past several years, cuts to higher education by the Governor and the Legislature have had a severe impact on students, their families, faculty and staff. The University has consistently objected to additional mid-year cuts, and while we certainly understand the ongoing fiscal challenges the State faces, we are requesting that this latest reduction be considered a one-time cut to UC’s budget and not made a permanent reduction. We will ask to have this funding restored to UC at the beginning of the next fiscal year (July 1, 2012).
In the current economic environment, marked by a huge State deficit and a limited revenue stream, we recognize that the Governor is in the eye of a “perfect storm.”
As we draw closer to the 2012-13 State budget release in January, however, we are asking the Governor to refrain from any additional cuts to higher education. Faculty and staff have sacrificed, and our students in particular have given more than their fair share.
Moreover, as we move forward, we will continue to work closely with State officials to develop a long-term revenue plan that will give the University much-needed financial stability.
This has been a challenging year for the University of California. I understand the concerns that many in the UC community have voiced over the recent incidents surrounding student protests on some of our campuses. I assure you that a thorough review of these incidents is in progress. I am making every effort possible to protect our long-held traditions of free speech and peaceful protests. During these difficult times, I ask you not to lose sight of our common goals—to make public higher education a priority and to keep a UC education accessible and affordable for Californians.
Thank you for your continued support for the University of California and best wishes for a happy holiday season.
Sincerely yours,
Mark G. Yudof
President
University of California
From http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=10150425120888379
One problem with this strategy is that a handshake deal between the UC president and the governor on a "compact" reached behind closed doors did not work out well under Schwarzenegger. The governor cannot appropriate funds; only the legislature can. To make such a deal work, there needs to be wider participation including the legislature, the Legislative Analyst, major interest groups, etc.
It would be nice to know what is going on behind the door:
Our earlier post on this subject is at http://uclafacultyassociation.blogspot.com/2011/12/buried-lede-uc-reviving-multiyear.html
UC-Berkeley Announces New Tuition/Financial Aid Plan

Below is the press release and a related video. Note that the aid is said to be financed by non-state sources including recycling revenue from out-of-state students.
UC Berkeley launches groundbreaking middle-class financial aid plan
By Public Affairs, UC Berkeley | December 14, 2011
University of California, Berkeley, Chancellor Robert Birgeneau announced today (Wednesday, Dec. 14) a new financial aid program to help middle-class families pay for the growing cost of an undergraduate degree.
For families whose gross income ranges from $80,000 to $140,000 annually, the new plan caps the contribution parents make toward the total annual cost of a UC Berkeley student’s education at 15 percent of their earnings. Total cost includes tuition, fees and expenses, such as room, board and books.
The initiative, named Berkeley MCAP (Middle Class Access Plan), is the first program in the nation at a public university to extend comprehensive financial aid to this category of middle-class families. The university is launching this initiative in recognition of California’s high cost of living, the challenges these families face and the significant tuition increases of recent years.
“Berkeley has an outstanding record of providing access through financial aid for students. As a result, our undergraduates leave college with among the lowest levels of student debt in the country,” said Birgeneau. “While our extraordinary commitment to financial aid has, in recent years, led to both an increasing number of lower income students on the Berkeley campus and a reduction in their net cost of attendance, we see early signs that middle-income families who cannot access existing assistance programs are straining to meet college costs. As a public institution we feel strongly that we need to sustain and expand access across the socio-economic spectrum. This plan is part of our commitment to ensuring that financial challenges do not prevent qualified students from attending one of the preeminent public universities in the nation.”
Financial aid awarded through the new program will be for the 2012-13 school year, which begins in August, and is for domestic undergraduate students, including incoming freshmen. Berkeley MCAP will augment the campus’s robust financial aid program that already provides grant aid to more than half of the campus’s 25,885 undergraduates and has lowered by 15 percent since 2005 the net cost of attendance for students from the most economically disadvantaged families. UC Berkeley distributes more than $600 million each year in grants, loans, work-study, fellowships and scholarships. Currently, approximately 40 percent of all undergraduates effectively pay no tuition.
Berkeley MCAP will assist all families within the $80-140,000 income range that have assets of less than $200,000, excluding the value of a home and retirement savings. Campus officials estimate that about 6,000 undergraduate students come from families in this income range. Residents of other states also will be eligible for assistance, although this program will not cover the cost of non-resident tuition. International students will not be eligible for Berkeley MCAP assistance. The parameters of the program will be reviewed on an annual basis.
“As state support for Berkeley has declined by more than half in just the past few years, tuition has increased dramatically, making up for only a portion of this disinvestment,” said Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs Harry LeGrande. “Today, the total cost of attendance is at a level that can be easily accommodated only by affluent families. Even as we continue to advocate for increased state support, we feel the need to address the very real issues of our middle-class families.”
Campus budget officials estimate that Berkeley MCAP will require between $10 million and $12 million in funding over the course of the 2012-13 academic year. They said they will not use state funds to fund the program, but instead will redirect expanded financial aid resources, philanthropy and revenue from the increased number of UC Berkeley students paying non-resident tuition.
The current cost of attendance at UC Berkeley for California residents living on campus is estimated to average $32,634 per year for students living on campus, including $12,834 in tuition and fees. Non-residents pay an additional $22,878 per year. To reduce the cost of attendance, students from economically disadvantaged families receive substantial grant aid from sources that include Pell Grants, Cal Grants and direct aid from the University of California.
The Berkeley MCAP announcement is being made now to ensure that families of students applying for 2012-13 admission know about Berkeley MCAP assistance before the financial aid application process begins in early January. UC Berkeley’s acting director of financial aid, Rachelle Feldman, encouraged eligible families of both currently enrolled and prospective students to file the “Free Application for Federal Student Aid” (FAFSA) form if they wish to be eligible for Berkeley MCAP.
“For these families, it’s a three-way partnership: Parents, students, and financial aid all make a contribution toward the cost of attendance. The Berkeley MCAP program is designed to help families with costs above and beyond the amount we expect students themselves to contribute,” Feldman said. “All students receiving financial aid assume some responsibility for paying for their own education, usually through work-study or student loans. At the same time, we take great pride in the fact that our students have, on average, among the lowest student debt levels in the nation upon graduation: The 40 percent of our undergraduates who graduate with any loans have an average debt of $16,056, as opposed to the national average of $25,000 for two-thirds of graduating students.”
According to recent reports from the Public Policy Institute of California, approximately half of all families in the state are in the middle-income bracket, and the gap between the highest and lowest income families is the widest in 30 years. Chancellor Birgeneau noted that the institute found that, “The most important factor driving the gap between high- and low-income workers is education,” and said he supports the report’s request that the state find “innovative ways to promote opportunity through education, especially so that middle- and lower-income families are not left behind.”
“The Berkeley MCAP program is necessary and completely consistent with everything we stand for as an institution,” Birgeneau said. “Public universities are the gateway to the American Dream, and the engine of future economic growth. We will continue to do everything in our power to serve the greater good through steps to preserve the excellence and affordability of this university.”
From: http://newscenter.berkeley.edu/2011/12/14/berkeley-middle-class-access-plan/
Video of the announcement:
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
Buried Lede: UC Reviving Multiyear Tuition Increase Plan with State?

Last September, UC President Yudof proposed to the Regents a multiyear tuition increase plan. The Regents argued among themselves and nothing was adopted. Today's San Francisco Chronicle, in a report on how higher ed is dealing with the trigger cuts (see earlier blog posts), has a buried lede*:
UC will offset the $100 million cut with money it over-contributed for health care, a pool of excess cash that happens to be just above $100 million, UC spokesman Steve Montiel said.
"It's a temporary solution," Montiel said, adding that UC is in talks with the state Department of Finance to try to work out a multiyear agreement in which the state would stop cutting the universities' budgets every year in exchange for a steady, predictable schedule of tuition increases.
Such "compacts" have been tried before, but have blown up in the face of persistent budget shortfalls.
Full article at: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/12/13/MNFV1MBVNN.DTL(idiomatic, US, journalism) To begin a story with details of secondary importance to the reader while postponing more essential points or facts. From http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bury_the_lede
Database on California Higher Ed Tuition
Thursday, November 17, 2011
PPIC Poll on Public Higher Ed in California
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
It Sure Looks Like the Trigger Is Going to be Pulled
There is an advance report from the Sacramento Bee that the Legislative Analyst later today will be announcing that projections of revenue will fall sufficiently short of assumptions to fire the budget trigger – which further chops the UC budget this year. By itself, just the LAO projection does not fire the trigger but it is part of the mechanism. The LAO report is not yet posted.
From the Bee:
California would impose $2 billion in mid-year "trigger" cuts next month, mostly through K-12 school reductions, under a new revenue forecast issued this morning by the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst's Office… The analyst's report is not the sole determinant of whether the state will impose those cuts, but it is one of two tools the Department of Finance must rely upon before deciding whether to slash spending. The finance department will issue its own forecast in December. The Analyst said the state will not receive $3.7 billion of the $4 billion revenue bump that Gov. Jerry Brown and lawmakers optimistically relied upon to help close the budget in June. The enacted budget projected the state would receive $88.5 billion in revenues and transfers; the analyst says it will only get $84.8 billion…
Full story at: http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2011/11/legislative-analyst-2-billion-of-mid-year-cuts.html
Of course, if the legislature could corral enough votes, it could stop the trigger. Let’s hope everything works out OK:
UPDATE: The LAO report has now been released. You can find it at
http://www.lao.ca.gov/reports/2011/bud/fiscal_outlook/fiscal_outlook_2011.pdf
As usual, the report - following the great state tradition of fuzzy language - uses "deficit" in a way that mixes up past debt (a stock) and flows. It also follows the great state tradition of including "transfers" with revenues which has an obscuring effect.
What the report basically says - but not in the language below - is that last year 2010-11 the state ran a surplus of about $2.8 billion (which included temporary taxes that are now gone). But that surplus was not enough to reduce the negative reserve in the general fund to zero or get it into positive territory. Cuts in spending were made for the current year and a revenue trigger was included which fires if optimistic revenue assumptions are not met. It looks as if the trigger will fire. The state will run a deficit (revenues and transfers < expenditures) of about $500 million in 2011-12, which makes the general fund reserve that much more negative. Next year - if nothing is done (which won't happen) - the state would have another deficit (revenues and transfers < expenditures) of $9.7 billion.
The task of the legislature starting in January will be to begin making further cuts, apart from what the trigger produces, unless someone comes up with a way of obtaining a substantial increase in revenue beyond what assumed economic group would produce. (Don't even think about what would happen if there were a double-dip recession!)
UC will experience a trigger cut of $100 million this year. Had the Regents meeting not been cancelled, President Yudof would have given the board a budget request to the state that all of this info more or less guarantees would not have been adopted by the legislature. Since the Regents meeting has been postponed, the folks at UCOP might well want to reconsider what to present whenever that meeting is reconvened in the light of the LAO report.
LAO Video on Report:
Further update: CSU approves 9% fee hike amid raucous protests
See http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2011/11/csu-approves-9-fee-hike-amid-raucous-protests.html