Pages

Showing posts with label tuition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tuition. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

UC Tuition: His Way or the Conway?

The photo shows Assembly Speaker John Pérez talking to GOPminority leader Connie Conway.  Given theexcerpt below from today’s online San Francisco Chronicle, let’s hope he isbeing super-persuasive.
==============
Excerpt:

California students from middle-income families wouldreceive massive breaks on tuition and fees at the state's colleges anduniversities under legislation Assembly Speaker John Pérez plans to introducetoday at the Capitol.  Under the plan,undergraduate students from families with household income of less than$150,000 would have their tuition and fees cut by two-thirds, bringing the costbelow what it was nearly a decade ago.  Itwould amount to a $4,000 annual savings for California State University studentsand just over $8,100 for students attending the University of California andwould take effect as soon as this fall. Both new students and current studentswould be eligible…

The speaker's office estimates the program would cost thestate about $1 billion per year, which would be raised by eliminating acorporate tax break that was approved in 2009 as part of budget negotiationsbetween Democrats and Republicans. That tax break allows corporations to choosethe cheaper of two formulas for calculating the taxes they owe…

Any change in the tax requires a two-thirds vote of the Legislature,which means at least two Republicans in each house must agree…


Actually, we have some audio of what Pérez is saying to Conway:

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

The 2009 "Toolbox" Report and the Japanese Garden (& Other Issues)

Given the ongoing budget crisis, UCLA formed a task force to look at various revenue-generating options.  The report of the task force is dated April 24, 2009.  Among the possibilities considered was the sale of various properties including the Japanese Garden.  The report indicates that consultations with the state Attorney General were underway well before the 2010 court decision that permitted the sale, even though it was inconsistent with the existing terms of the donation.


The report explores other areas such as faculty pay, fund raising, "branding," and tuition.  You can read the full report at the link below (scroll towards the bottom of this post.


Below is the Table of Contents.  Below that is the section on the Japanese Garden:


I. Task Force Chargeand Process p. 1
II. Principles forReview of Revenue Creation Proposals p. 2
III. Summary ofRecommendations p. 4
IV. Major Issues andRecommendations
                   Student Fees p. 6
                   Enrollment of Nonresident Undergraduates p. 14
                   Development of New Academic Programs & Services p. 15
                   Research Funding p. 19
                   Faculty Compensation Plan p. 21
                   Brand Extension Licensing p. 23
                   Fundraising Opportunities p. 25
                   Sale of Underutilized Property p. 27
Appendix A: UCLAApproval Process for Revenue-Generating
Courses and Programs p.30
Appendix B: RevenueGenerating Course and Programs
Administrative Guide p.34
Appendix C: Guidelines for endowedchairs p. 36
=============
Task Force Membership:

  • Kathryn Atchison, Vice Provost for Intellectual Property and Industry Relations
  • Hilu Bloch, Associate Dean & CAO, Anderson Graduate School of Management
  • Robin Garrell, Professor and Vice Chair, Academic Senate
  • Janina Montero, Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs
  • Sam Morabito, Administrative Vice Chancellor
  • Steven A. Olsen, Vice Chancellor, Finance, Budget & Capital Programs (chair)
  • No-Hee Park, Dean, School of Dentistry
  • Cathy Sandeen, Dean, University Extension
  • Michael Schill, Dean, School of Law
  • Rhea Turteltaub, Vice Chancellor, External Affairs
  • David Unruh, Assistant Provost, Academic Program Development
  • Kang Wang, Professor, School of Engineering and Applied Science

===========
Section on Japanese Garden

From pp. 27-28:

The Carter Estate:

The Carter Estate, located at 626 Siena Way, Bel Air, about one milefrom campus, is situated on 0.85 acres and includes a two story residence andan adjacent guest house in approximately 7300 gross square feet. The house wasvacated by Mrs. Carter in early 2006. The house, which has remained vacantsince Mrs. Carter’s departure, is currently being managed by UCLA AssetManagement.
In June, 2007, the value of this property was appraised at $9,000,000.The University is free to sell this property (via a competitive public bidprocess) but the proceeds must fund seven endowments specified by Mr. Carterincluding endowed chairs in the College, Anderson and the School of Medicine, amaintenance endowment for the Japanese Gardens, the establishment of an arthistory research center in the College, a student awards fund for Anderson anda discretionary fund for the director of the Jules Stein Eye Institute. In2006, the estimate of the amount needed to fund the corpus for these endowmentswas $4.7 million. As such, the net proceeds from the sale of the home would benet of the $4.7 million.

The Japanese Gardens:

The UCLA Hannah Carter Japanese Garden and the UCLA Carter House(described above) were, prior to December 1964 part of a single parcel ofapproximately 1.94 acres. In 1964 the Gardens portion of the site was separatedfrom the Carter House portion. The 1964 grant deed transferring the property tothe Regents was amended in 1982 with the requirement that the University namesthe garden for Mrs. Carter and retain it in perpetuity. 

Significant research has beencompleted on the process (via the California Attorney General) required toremove the restriction on the Garden so that the University could then sell theproperty. We are advised that it would be possible to remove the restriction butthe outcome is not certain. And, there would likely be some politicalramifications from various groups about the sale of the Gardens as a potentialbuilding site.

In 2007, the MAI appraisal indicates a value of $5.7 million if theproperty can be sold without the deed restriction to maintain it as the Gardensand $3.4 million with the restriction intact.
The combined value of selling both the Carter House and the Gardens(with the restriction on the Gardens in place) was $12.5 million. The value ofthe combined properties without restrictions was estimated in 2007 at $14.7million. Of course property values since 2007 have declined, thus an updatedappraisal would be required to ascertain the current value of these properties.
==============
Link to report:

Open publication - Free publishing - More branding

It is not known how much time was spent by the Task Force specifically on the Japanese Garden issue.  During the period in which the task force operated, UCLA had a website for the garden which has since been taken down.  However, you can see the website as it was - and as it was available to the task force at:
http://web.archive.org/web/20100815093728/http://www.japanesegarden.ucla.edu/



Friday, February 3, 2012

"That Which Cannot Go on Forever Must Come to an End"

So said Herbert Stein, who was President Nixon's chief economist for a time.  He wasn't speaking about rising tuition back then.  However, President Obama's remarks on rising university tuition at the State of the Union address - which were roughly along those lines - continue to generate controversy.


Inside Higher Ed today has a long piece on responses in the U.S. Senate.  The article concludes with:  Perhaps sensing a popular cause to champion with an election looming, senators in both parties seemed eager to continue discussions on how to hold down college prices.  Committee Chairman Tom Harkin, Democrat of Iowa, promised more discussion on the subject.  “This," he said, " is the first of many hearings."


Full article at: http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/02/03/senate-help-committee-hears-college-affordability-testimony

Thursday, February 2, 2012

Regents Will Consider UC-Riverside Student Plan for Alternative to Tuition in March

Back in 1967, the Regents were curious about the goings on in the Los Alamos Nuclear Lab aas the photo on the left shows.  According to a report in today's Inside Higher Ed, the Regents' curiosity this March will focus on a plan (reported in an earlier blog post) by UC-Riverside students for an alternative to tuition.

Essentially, the students' plan would involve payment after graduation as a share of income rather than the current system of upfront payment, either in cash or through a loan.  The proposal is not a new idea.  And it raises issues of logistics, i.e., how actually to collect those payments.

There are also cash flow issues.  What would finance university operations during the period before the payments first began to arrive?  Could the university borrow against an uncertain flow of future payments?  Note that some of those operations involve recycling of tuition receipts to low-income students.

The article is at http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/02/02/uc-system-weighs-shift-tuition-payments-after-graduation



Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Worries About the Obama Tuition Plan Seem Confined to Private Universities

Earlier posts on this blog  noted the remarks of President Obama indicating that the federal government would somehow penalize universities whose tuitions were rising.  But yours truly also opined that it was very unlikely that public universities, such as UC, would be penalized since their tuitions were lower than the privates and they tended to enroll a greater percentage of lower income students.

A short piece today in Inside Higher Ed seems to reinforce that view.  It seems that it is presidents of private universities that are upset.

See http://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2012/02/01/white-house-adviser-takes-questions-obamas-plan

In short, it's one less thing to worry about.  So be happy:


PS: An earlier blog post also gave you some assurance about the kind of headlines depicted below:

Friday, January 27, 2012

More on the Obama/Tuition Issue

As a prior blog post noted, President Obama's State of the Nation address earlier this week contained a threat to cut federal support to universities whose tuitions were rising. But it was not clear what exactly was involved.

Insider Higher Ed has a brief story - with a link to a NY Times iece and a link to a White House fact sheet about the proposal.  In fact, to the extent that the proposal is implemented - always a question given Congressional gridlock - UC and UCLA are likely to benefit.  Our tuition is rising but it is still low compared to the privates and many publics.  And we have a good record at this campus with low income student enrollment and support.  The issue is whether UC would be rewarded for relatively low tuition or penalized for percentage increases in tuition starting from a low base.  The tuition under consideration is not the sticker price - which is what gets aired at Regents meetings - but the net price after student aid from the university.

The Insider Higher Ed story is at http://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2012/01/27/full-details-obamas-college-affordability-proposals-updated

Below is (most of) the fact sheet:

For ImmediateRelease

January 27, 2012

FACT SHEET: PresidentObama’s Blueprint for Keeping College Affordable and Within Reach for AllAmericans

“Ofcourse, it’s not enough for us to increase student aid… States also need to dotheir part, by making higher education a higher priority in theirbudgets.   And colleges and universities have to do their part byworking to keep costs down.”
                                                                                               President Barack Obama
                                                                                               State of the Union, January 24, 2012

Inhis State of the Union address, President Obama laid out a blueprint for aneconomy that’s built to last – an economy built on American manufacturing,American energy, skills for American workers, and a renewal of American values.As an important part of keeping the American promise alive, the Presidentcalled for a comprehensive approach to tackling rising college costs.  Intoday’s global economy, a college education is no longer just a privilege forsome, but rather a prerequisite for all.  To reach a national goal ofleading the world with the highest share of college graduates by 2020, we mustmake college more affordable.

PresidentObama has emphasized the responsibility shared by the federal government,states, colleges, and universities to promote access and affordability inhigher education, by reining in college costs, providing value for Americanfamilies, and preparing students with a solid education to succeed in theircareers. Over the past three years, the Obama Administration has taken historic steps to help studentsafford college, including reforming our student aid system to become moreefficient and reliable and by expanding grant aid and college taxcredits. 

This year, President Obama is calling on Congress to advance new reforms that will promote shared responsibility toaddress the college affordability challenge. If these proposals are passed,this will be the first time in history that the federal government has tiedfederal campus aid to responsible campus tuition policies
President Obama will begin the third day of his post-State of the Uniontravels with an event at the University of Michigan campus in Ann Arbor,focusing on the importance of tackling rising college costs to ensure America’sstudentsand workers can obtain the education and training they need so that we have aworkforce prepared for the jobs of the 21st century.
Shared Responsibility toTackle Rising College Costs

Rewarding Schools thatKeep College Affordable

·        ThePresident’s proposal to reform student aid to keep tuition from spiraling toohigh and drive greater value will improve distribution of federal financial aid and increasecampus-based aid. This reform will reward colleges that are succeeding inmeeting the following principles:

1)     Settingresponsible tuition policy, offering relatively lower net tuition prices and/or restrainingtuition growth.
2)     Providinggood value to students and families, offering quality education and training that preparesgraduates to obtain employment and repay their loans.
3)     Servinglow-income students, enrolling and graduating relatively higher numbers ofPell-eligible students.

The campus-based aid that the federal government provides to collegesthrough Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants (SEOG), Perkins Loans, andWork Study isdistributed under an antiquated formula that rewards colleges for longevity inthe program and provides no incentive to keep tuition costs low. The President is proposing to change how those funds are distributed byimplementing an improved formula that shifts aid from schools with risingtuition to those acting responsibly, focused on setting responsible tuitionpolicy, providing good value in education, and ensuring that higher numbers oflow-income students complete their education. He is also proposing to increasethe amount of campus-based aid to $10 billion annually. The increase isprimarily driven by an expansion of loans in the federal Perkins program –which comes at no additional taxpayer cost.

Colleges that can show that they are providing students with good long-termvalue will be rewarded with additional dollars to help students attend. Thosethat show poor value, or who don't act responsibly in setting tuition,will receive less federal campus-based aid.  Students will receivethe greatest government grant and loan support at colleges where they arelikely to be best served, and little or no campus aid will flow to collegesthat fail to meet affordability and value standards.

Creating New Incentivesto Promote Affordability and Quality

·        The Raceto the Top: College Affordability and Completion will promote change instate systems of higher education. The President is proposing a program thatwould spur systemic state reforms to reduce costs for students and promotesuccess in our higher education system at public colleges. This $1 billioninvestment would incentivize states to:

o   Revamp the structure of state financing forhigher education.
o   Align entry and exit standards with K-12education and colleges to facilitate on-time completion.
o   Maintain adequate levels of funding forhigher education in order to address important long-term causes of cost growthat the public institutions that serve two-thirds of four-year college students.

The Race to the Top forCollege Affordability and Completion would incentivize governors and statelegislatures around the nation to act on spurring this innovative reform.Through cost-saving measures like redesigning courses and making better use ofeducation technology, institutions can keep costs down to provide greateraffordability for students.

·        TheFirst in the World competition will improve long-term productivity in higher education by investing$55 million to enable individual colleges (including Minority-ServingInstitutions) and nonprofit organizations to develop, validate, or scale upinnovative and effective strategies for boosting productivity and enhancingquality on campuses. This initiative would provide modest start-up funding forindividual colleges, including private colleges, for projects that could leadto longer-term and larger productivity improvements among colleges anduniversities – such as course redesign through the improved use of technology,early college preparation activities to lessen the need for remediation,competency-based approaches to gaining college credit, and other ideas aimed atspurring changes in the culture of higher education.

EmpoweringFamilies and Students to be Informed Consumers

·        New actionsto provide consumers with clearer information about college costs and qualitywill improve the decision-making process in higher education for Americanstudents and allow families to hold schools accountable for their tuition andoutcomes.  President Obama is proposing new tools to provide students andfamilies with information on higher education, presented in a comparable andeasy-to-understand format:

o   The Administration will create a CollegeScorecard for all degree-granting institutions making it easier forstudents and families to choose a college that is best suited to their needs,priced affordably, and consistent with their career and educationalgoals. 
o   We will also make an updated version of the‘Financial Aid Shopping Sheet,’ announced in October, a requiredtemplate for all colleges, rather than a voluntary tool, to make it easier forfamilies to compare college financial aid packages.
o   The President is also proposing to begin collectingearnings and employment information for colleges, so that studentscan have an even better sense of the post post-graduation outcomes they canexpect.

RedoublingFederal Support to Tackle College Costs

·        Ashighlighted by the President in his State of the Union address, we are callingon Congress to:

o   Keep student loaninterest rates low: This summer, the interest rates on subsidized Stafford studentloans are set to double from 3.4% to 6.8% – a significant burden at a time whenthe economy is still fragile and students are taking on increasing amounts ofdebt to earn a degree. The President is asking Congress to prevent that hikefrom taking place for a year to keep student debt down, a proposal that willkeep interest rates low for 7.4 million student loan borrowers and save theaverage student over a thousand dollars.
o   Double the number ofwork-study jobs available:  The President also proposes to double the number ofcareer-related work-study opportunities so that students are able to gainvaluable work-related experience while in school.
o   Maintain our commitmentto college affordability: Over 9 million students and families per year take advantage ofthe Obama Administration’s American Opportunity Tax Credit – supporting up to$10,000 over four years of college.  In his State of the Union address,the President called on Congress to make this tax credit permanent and preventit from expiring in 2012. 
Building on Progress

President Obama has worked throughout hisAdministration to expand access to college and provide greater resources andsupport so that more students graduate with the skills and knowledge they needto succeed in the workforce:

·        Helpingstudents and families pay for college: The Obama Administration has raised the maximum Pell Grant awardto $5,635 next year – a $905 increase since 2008.

Making collegeloans more affordable: The Obama Administration’s “Pay as You Earn” plan will enable 1.6million students to take advantage of a new option to cap student loanrepayments at 10% of monthly income as soon as this year. Borrowerslooking to determine whether or not income-based repayment is the right optionfor them should visit http://studentaid.ed.gov/ibr

UPDATE: NPR has a report at
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2012/01/27/145985134/college-presidents-have-problems-with-obamas-message-on-tuition

UPDATE: President Yudof's response:

The University of California appreciates President Obama's focus on higher education and his efforts to assure that college is within reach for all Americans. We are pleased that the president is looking at ways to reward institutions that are doing a good job graduating more low-income students.

The University of California already has tuition that is highly redistributive: One third of every tuition dollar goes to financial aid, and more than half of our students pay no tuition. We have a strong record of providing high-quality education to students from families from a broad range of income levels, and we look forward to working with the Obama administration and Congress on these proposals as they move forward.

UC is proud of the robust state and institutional financial aid our enrolled students receive, and the university is continuously working to ensure that college costs remain low and affordable. Over the years, UC has cut costs and become significantly more efficient, while serving a historically high number of students. UC will continue to take actions to reduce costs and maintain its high quality and will work with the state of California to ensure a strong commitment to funding public higher education.




Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Obama on Higher Ed Tuition and State Support

In the State of the Union address last night, President Obama called on states to enhance their higher ed budgets and universities to hold down tuition.  Whether the California state legislature is going to heed that request is another matter, of course. The President talked about less federal aid if tuition goes up, although in what form that would come about was not clear.


Video clip below.
"When kids do graduate, the most daunting challenge can be the cost of college.  At a time when Americans owe more in tuition debt than credit card debt, this Congress needs to stop the interest rates on student loans from doubling in July.  Extend the tuition tax credit we started that saves middle-class families thousands of dollars.  And give more young people the chance to earn their way through college by doubling the number of work-study jobs in the next five years.

Of course, it’s not enough for us to increase student aid.  We can’t just keep subsidizing skyrocketing tuition; we’ll run out of money.  States also need to do their part, by making higher education a higher priority in their budgets.  And colleges and universities have to do their part by working to keep costs down.  Recently, I spoke with a group of college presidents who’ve done just that.  Some schools re-design courses to help students finish more quickly.  Some use better technology.  The point is, it’s possible.  So let me put colleges and universities on notice:  If you can’t stop tuition from going up, the funding you get from taxpayers will go down.  Higher education can’t be a luxury – it’s an economic imperative that every family in America should be able to afford."

UPDATE: Inside Higher Ed has a report on reactions to the statement at:
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/01/26/obama-plan-tie-tuition-prices-aid-eligibility-draws-criticism

Saturday, January 21, 2012

Plenty of Nothing

Here is a quote from the governor’s recent budget proposal: "The University of California (UC) willreceive an increase of $90 million General Fund for base operating costs, whichcan be used to address costs related to retirement program contributions."

Question: What does it mean?  Answer: Nothing.  UC has always been free to take its generalrevenue and put it into the pension fund. Indeed, since the state has so far refused to resume paying the employercontribution for state-funded employees into the pension fund, that is what UChas been doing.

Question: If it means nothing, why are you discussingit?  Answer: It appears that some folksup in Oakland view this statement as a kind of recognition of a stateliability for the UC pension.  As we havedocumented repeatedly, before the two-decade pension contribution “holiday,” the stateroutinely paid its contribution, even putting in IOUs when it was short ofcash.  When the state paid in, whether in cash or in IOUs, that action allowed UC to collect from non-state sources, currently roughly $2 fromnon-state for every $1 of state.
 
Earlier in the state budget crisis, then-GovernorSchwarzenegger put a token $20 million in his budget proposal for the UCpension.  But the legislature – acting onadvice of the Legislative Analyst – deleted the $20 million and insertedbudgetary language that there was no state liability.  That perverse language was later removed, butsince then there has been zero progress in getting state recognition of itsliability.  Note that CSU, which is partof CalPERS, does not have this burden since the state does not dispute itsliability to the giant CalPERS system.

If UC depicts the governor’s non-statement as amounting tomore than nothing, we will continue to get just that: nothing.  As we have noted before, if the state wantsto privatize UC, not taking responsibility for the pension liability is a goodway to do it.  The Regents can’t createmoney.  They cannot raise taxes.  They can only keep raising tuition.

So let’s not pretend nothing is something.  This song sums it up nicely:


A history of UC pension funding by Faculty Association Executive Director Susan Gallick is at http://www.uclafaculty.org/FASite/Home_files/UCRPCAPolicyOpt2012%20.pdf

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

UC-Riverside Students Propose Tuition Alternative Based on Future Pay

From the Riverside Press-Enterprise,1/16/12.  As the excerpt below notes, theidea described has been around for awhile in various forms.  There would need to be a legally-bindingmechanism for verification of income and payback including for grads who left California.  And there could be variations in the formula used.   It will be interesting to see what UCOP andthe Regents have to say:
It tooknine months of late-night meetings, data crunching, calculations andconsultations by a small group of UC Riverside students to hammer out what theysay is an antidote to state cutbacks for higher education and tuition that hasnearly quadrupled in 10 years.  They callthemselves FixUC. Their manifesto is the UC Student Investment Proposal, whichcalls for eliminating the upfront costs of college and having working graduatespay 5 percent of their salary back to the system for 20 years…
Theproposal has caught the attention of UC honchos, primarily because it wasconceived by students, UC spokesman Steve Montiel said. Two UC vice presidentsare scheduled to meet with the group before the regents meeting…
A similaridea was raised in 2009 by UC Berkeley economist Robert Reich, a laborsecretary in the Clinton administration who was appointed to a UC commission toaddress state funding cuts…

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Tuition Bargain at UCLA

Despite skyrocketingtuition costs, three University of California schools were named among thenation’s best public school bargains in rankings published Tuesday byKiplinger’s Personal Finance.
UCBerkeley, UCLA, and UC San Diegofinished seventh, ninth and 10th, respectively, in the magazine’s annualanalysis, which honors 100 schools for their combination of quality andaffordability. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill was ranked firstfor the 11th consecutive year…

What a bargain!  Wejust need someone to get the word out:

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Don't Look for Holiday Cheer from the Washington Post

The Washington Post has looked west of late:


UC-Berkeley and other‘public Ivies’ in fiscal peril

Daniel de Vise, Dec.26, 2011, Washington Post


Across the nation, ahistoric collapse in state funding for higher education threatens to diminishthe stature of premier public universities and erode their mission as enginesof upward social mobility.  At theUniversity of Virginia, state support has dwindled in two decades from 26percent of the operating budget to 7 percent. At the University of Michigan, ithas declined from 48 percent to 17 percent. Not even the nation’s finest public university is immune. The Universityof California at Berkeley — birthplace of the free-speech movement, home to nineliving Nobel laureates — subsists now in perpetual austerity. Star faculty takemandatory furloughs. Classes grow perceptibly larger each year. Roofs leak;e-mail crashes. One employee mows the entire campus. Wastebaskets are emptiedonce a week. Some professors lack telephones…

Tuition costs surging

In academia, there isparticular concern for the sector leaders known as “public Ivies.”  These top public universities (a group thatincludes Berkeley, UCLA and the universities of Michigan, North Carolina andVirginia) educate many more students than their Ivy League counterparts.Berkeley alone serves roughly the same number of low-income students — measuredin federal Pell grant data — as the Ivies do together…

Thursday, December 15, 2011

Another Hint of Discussions with the State Behind Closed Doors on Multiyear Tuition Increase Deal

The text below in italics is from UC President Yudof’s Facebook page. As noted in a prior post on this blog, there are hints of a multiyear-tuition-increase/steady-budget-support-from-the-state being discussed behind closed doors with Brown administration officials. See the bold print below.

We are extremely disappointed that UC is faced with yet another significant State budget reduction: the $100 million “trigger cut” just announced. This additional cut will exacerbate the fiscal challenges the University faces in the current year and place additional stress on the quality of education provided to UC students. While the $650 million cut to UC enacted by the State last June resulted in additional tuition hikes for our students, let me assure you there are no 2011-12 mid-year tuition increases planned.

Over the past several years, cuts to higher education by the Governor and the Legislature have had a severe impact on students, their families, faculty and staff. The University has consistently objected to additional mid-year cuts, and while we certainly understand the ongoing fiscal challenges the State faces, we are requesting that this latest reduction be considered a one-time cut to UC’s budget and not made a permanent reduction. We will ask to have this funding restored to UC at the beginning of the next fiscal year (July 1, 2012).

In the current economic environment, marked by a huge State deficit and a limited revenue stream, we recognize that the Governor is in the eye of a “perfect storm.”

As we draw closer to the 2012-13 State budget release in January, however, we are asking the Governor to refrain from any additional cuts to higher education. Faculty and staff have sacrificed, and our students in particular have given more than their fair share.

Moreover, as we move forward, we will continue to work closely with State officials to develop a long-term revenue plan that will give the University much-needed financial stability.

This has been a challenging year for the University of California. I understand the concerns that many in the UC community have voiced over the recent incidents surrounding student protests on some of our campuses. I assure you that a thorough review of these incidents is in progress. I am making every effort possible to protect our long-held traditions of free speech and peaceful protests. During these difficult times, I ask you not to lose sight of our common goals—to make public higher education a priority and to keep a UC education accessible and affordable for Californians.

Thank you for your continued support for the University of California and best wishes for a happy holiday season.

Sincerely yours,

Mark G. Yudof

President

University of California

From http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=10150425120888379

One problem with this strategy is that a handshake deal between the UC president and the governor on a "compact" reached behind closed doors did not work out well under Schwarzenegger. The governor cannot appropriate funds; only the legislature can. To make such a deal work, there needs to be wider participation including the legislature, the Legislative Analyst, major interest groups, etc.

It would be nice to know what is going on behind the door:

Our earlier post on this subject is at http://uclafacultyassociation.blogspot.com/2011/12/buried-lede-uc-reviving-multiyear.html

UC-Berkeley Announces New Tuition/Financial Aid Plan

Below is the press release and a related video. Note that the aid is said to be financed by non-state sources including recycling revenue from out-of-state students.

UC Berkeley launches groundbreaking middle-class financial aid plan

By Public Affairs, UC Berkeley | December 14, 2011

University of California, Berkeley, Chancellor Robert Birgeneau announced today (Wednesday, Dec. 14) a new financial aid program to help middle-class families pay for the growing cost of an undergraduate degree.

For families whose gross income ranges from $80,000 to $140,000 annually, the new plan caps the contribution parents make toward the total annual cost of a UC Berkeley student’s education at 15 percent of their earnings. Total cost includes tuition, fees and expenses, such as room, board and books.

The initiative, named Berkeley MCAP (Middle Class Access Plan), is the first program in the nation at a public university to extend comprehensive financial aid to this category of middle-class families. The university is launching this initiative in recognition of California’s high cost of living, the challenges these families face and the significant tuition increases of recent years.

“Berkeley has an outstanding record of providing access through financial aid for students. As a result, our undergraduates leave college with among the lowest levels of student debt in the country,” said Birgeneau. “While our extraordinary commitment to financial aid has, in recent years, led to both an increasing number of lower income students on the Berkeley campus and a reduction in their net cost of attendance, we see early signs that middle-income families who cannot access existing assistance programs are straining to meet college costs. As a public institution we feel strongly that we need to sustain and expand access across the socio-economic spectrum. This plan is part of our commitment to ensuring that financial challenges do not prevent qualified students from attending one of the preeminent public universities in the nation.”

Financial aid awarded through the new program will be for the 2012-13 school year, which begins in August, and is for domestic undergraduate students, including incoming freshmen. Berkeley MCAP will augment the campus’s robust financial aid program that already provides grant aid to more than half of the campus’s 25,885 undergraduates and has lowered by 15 percent since 2005 the net cost of attendance for students from the most economically disadvantaged families. UC Berkeley distributes more than $600 million each year in grants, loans, work-study, fellowships and scholarships. Currently, approximately 40 percent of all undergraduates effectively pay no tuition.

Berkeley MCAP will assist all families within the $80-140,000 income range that have assets of less than $200,000, excluding the value of a home and retirement savings. Campus officials estimate that about 6,000 undergraduate students come from families in this income range. Residents of other states also will be eligible for assistance, although this program will not cover the cost of non-resident tuition. International students will not be eligible for Berkeley MCAP assistance. The parameters of the program will be reviewed on an annual basis.

“As state support for Berkeley has declined by more than half in just the past few years, tuition has increased dramatically, making up for only a portion of this disinvestment,” said Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs Harry LeGrande. “Today, the total cost of attendance is at a level that can be easily accommodated only by affluent families. Even as we continue to advocate for increased state support, we feel the need to address the very real issues of our middle-class families.”

Campus budget officials estimate that Berkeley MCAP will require between $10 million and $12 million in funding over the course of the 2012-13 academic year. They said they will not use state funds to fund the program, but instead will redirect expanded financial aid resources, philanthropy and revenue from the increased number of UC Berkeley students paying non-resident tuition.

The current cost of attendance at UC Berkeley for California residents living on campus is estimated to average $32,634 per year for students living on campus, including $12,834 in tuition and fees. Non-residents pay an additional $22,878 per year. To reduce the cost of attendance, students from economically disadvantaged families receive substantial grant aid from sources that include Pell Grants, Cal Grants and direct aid from the University of California.

The Berkeley MCAP announcement is being made now to ensure that families of students applying for 2012-13 admission know about Berkeley MCAP assistance before the financial aid application process begins in early January. UC Berkeley’s acting director of financial aid, Rachelle Feldman, encouraged eligible families of both currently enrolled and prospective students to file the “Free Application for Federal Student Aid” (FAFSA) form if they wish to be eligible for Berkeley MCAP.

“For these families, it’s a three-way partnership: Parents, students, and financial aid all make a contribution toward the cost of attendance. The Berkeley MCAP program is designed to help families with costs above and beyond the amount we expect students themselves to contribute,” Feldman said. “All students receiving financial aid assume some responsibility for paying for their own education, usually through work-study or student loans. At the same time, we take great pride in the fact that our students have, on average, among the lowest student debt levels in the nation upon graduation: The 40 percent of our undergraduates who graduate with any loans have an average debt of $16,056, as opposed to the national average of $25,000 for two-thirds of graduating students.”

According to recent reports from the Public Policy Institute of California, approximately half of all families in the state are in the middle-income bracket, and the gap between the highest and lowest income families is the widest in 30 years. Chancellor Birgeneau noted that the institute found that, “The most important factor driving the gap between high- and low-income workers is education,” and said he supports the report’s request that the state find “innovative ways to promote opportunity through education, especially so that middle- and lower-income families are not left behind.”

“The Berkeley MCAP program is necessary and completely consistent with everything we stand for as an institution,” Birgeneau said. “Public universities are the gateway to the American Dream, and the engine of future economic growth. We will continue to do everything in our power to serve the greater good through steps to preserve the excellence and affordability of this university.”

From: http://newscenter.berkeley.edu/2011/12/14/berkeley-middle-class-access-plan/

Video of the announcement:

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Buried Lede: UC Reviving Multiyear Tuition Increase Plan with State?

Last September, UC President Yudof proposed to the Regents a multiyear tuition increase plan. The Regents argued among themselves and nothing was adopted. Today's San Francisco Chronicle, in a report on how higher ed is dealing with the trigger cuts (see earlier blog posts), has a buried lede*:

UC will offset the $100 million cut with money it over-contributed for health care, a pool of excess cash that happens to be just above $100 million, UC spokesman Steve Montiel said.

"It's a temporary solution," Montiel said, adding that UC is in talks with the state Department of Finance to try to work out a multiyear agreement in which the state would stop cutting the universities' budgets every year in exchange for a steady, predictable schedule of tuition increases.

Such "compacts" have been tried before, but have blown up in the face of persistent budget shortfalls.

Full article at: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/12/13/MNFV1MBVNN.DTL

*Verb: to bury the lede

(idiomatic, US, journalism) To begin a story with details of secondary importance to the reader while postponing more essential points or facts. From http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bury_the_lede

Database on California Higher Ed Tuition

The Sacramento Bee has a database on line for searching tuition trends in public and private higher ed institutions in California. Above is a chart from that source on UCLA tuition. The database is at http://www.sacbee.com/2011/09/29/3948273/database-tuition-trends-at-californias.html

Thursday, November 17, 2011

PPIC Poll on Public Higher Ed in California



The charts above come from a poll taken by the Public Policy Institute of California available at:
http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/survey/S_1111MBS.pdf [Click on the table above to enlarge it or go to the report itself.]

You can interpret the charts as you like. As the saying goes, an optimist is someone who thinks we are in the best of all possible worlds - and a pessimist is also someone who thinks we are in the best of all possible worlds.

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

It Sure Looks Like the Trigger Is Going to be Pulled

There is an advance report from the Sacramento Bee that the Legislative Analyst later today will be announcing that projections of revenue will fall sufficiently short of assumptions to fire the budget trigger – which further chops the UC budget this year. By itself, just the LAO projection does not fire the trigger but it is part of the mechanism. The LAO report is not yet posted.

From the Bee:

California would impose $2 billion in mid-year "trigger" cuts next month, mostly through K-12 school reductions, under a new revenue forecast issued this morning by the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst's Office… The analyst's report is not the sole determinant of whether the state will impose those cuts, but it is one of two tools the Department of Finance must rely upon before deciding whether to slash spending. The finance department will issue its own forecast in December. The Analyst said the state will not receive $3.7 billion of the $4 billion revenue bump that Gov. Jerry Brown and lawmakers optimistically relied upon to help close the budget in June. The enacted budget projected the state would receive $88.5 billion in revenues and transfers; the analyst says it will only get $84.8 billion…

Full story at: http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2011/11/legislative-analyst-2-billion-of-mid-year-cuts.html

Of course, if the legislature could corral enough votes, it could stop the trigger. Let’s hope everything works out OK:

UPDATE: The LAO report has now been released. You can find it at

http://www.lao.ca.gov/reports/2011/bud/fiscal_outlook/fiscal_outlook_2011.pdf

As usual, the report - following the great state tradition of fuzzy language - uses "deficit" in a way that mixes up past debt (a stock) and flows. It also follows the great state tradition of including "transfers" with revenues which has an obscuring effect.

What the report basically says - but not in the language below - is that last year 2010-11 the state ran a surplus of about $2.8 billion (which included temporary taxes that are now gone). But that surplus was not enough to reduce the negative reserve in the general fund to zero or get it into positive territory. Cuts in spending were made for the current year and a revenue trigger was included which fires if optimistic revenue assumptions are not met. It looks as if the trigger will fire. The state will run a deficit (revenues and transfers < expenditures) of about $500 million in 2011-12, which makes the general fund reserve that much more negative. Next year - if nothing is done (which won't happen) - the state would have another deficit (revenues and transfers < expenditures) of $9.7 billion.

The task of the legislature starting in January will be to begin making further cuts, apart from what the trigger produces, unless someone comes up with a way of obtaining a substantial increase in revenue beyond what assumed economic group would produce. (Don't even think about what would happen if there were a double-dip recession!)

UC will experience a trigger cut of $100 million this year. Had the Regents meeting not been cancelled, President Yudof would have given the board a budget request to the state that all of this info more or less guarantees would not have been adopted by the legislature. Since the Regents meeting has been postponed, the folks at UCOP might well want to reconsider what to present whenever that meeting is reconvened in the light of the LAO report.

LAO Video on Report:

Further update: CSU approves 9% fee hike amid raucous protests
See http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2011/11/csu-approves-9-fee-hike-amid-raucous-protests.html